Resolution on Medicaid Funding Through a Federal Block Grant

Resolution on Medicaid Funding Through a Federal Block Grant

Model Resolution

WHEREAS, Total U.S. Medicaid spending in 2006 exceeded $303 billion; and

WHEREAS, The share of federal Medicaid funding provided to the states is determined by a state-by-state matching percentage, and the actual amount of federal funding sent to the states is determined by how much the states spend in order to get those matching dollars; and

WHEREAS, Medicaid policy is also heavily controlled by the federal government, requiring states to apply for waivers if they want the flexibility to reform their Medicaid programs to better meet state needs; and

WHEREAS, States are encouraged to expand Medicaid programs and spend more to get additional funding.  The U.S. Government Accountability Office projects that Medicaid spending will grow by 224 percent between 2007 and 2032, and at the same time Medicare and Social Security will put significant pressure on the federal budget; and

WHEREAS, These cost trends and projections for Medicaid, Medicare, and Social Security are unsustainable and will likely lead to difficult cost shifting from the federal government to the states in the Medicaid program, with the result that states will struggle to support their individual Medicaid programs without meaningful control over the policy; and

WHEREAS, Current Medicaid funding arrangements fail to reward states based on performance, but give states additional funding based on outright government appropriations; and

WHEREAS, Medicaid growth is fueled by an interest in gaining additional federal funding, which also makes reductions in state Medicaid spending more difficult due to the additional loss of federal funding; and

WHEREAS, Welfare reform changed the way states managed welfare programs by giving states more policy control and performance expectations, with a fixed amount of money each year; and

WHEREAS, Because welfare reform has proven to be a success since its passage more than ten years ago, states should ask for a similar arrangement with Medicaid that would give states more policy flexibility, fixed state funding, and broad performance goals; and

WHEREAS, Federal funding for the State Children’s Health Insurance Program (SCHIP) is allocated to states based on a matching rate up to a total fixed amount of federal funding determined by state need, so there is clear precedent for giving states greater latitude in setting eligibility standards and a fixed amount of funding for similar programs.

THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED THAT {Insert legislative body} believes that {insert state} is best suited to make decisions on Medicaid policy for the residents of this state, including prioritizing state Medicaid spending to reflect the unique needs of {insert state}, and setting eligibility standards that reflect state priorities.

BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED THAT {Insert legislative body} believes that a federal block grant for Medicaid funding would give states greater flexibility to manage the state Medicaid budget and tailor the program to meet state objectives.

BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED THAT Copies of this resolution be sent to the President of the United States, the United States Congress, and the appropriate leadership of the United States Department of Health and Human Services.

Re-approved by the ALEC Board of Directors January 9, 2014.

 

Keyword Tags: 2013 SNPS, Health and Human Services Task Force, Public Health Insurance Reform